The article was published on
the website theartnewspaper.com on March 22, 2013. The article reports about the
decision to close a major arms and armour museum in Massachusetts.
The article touches upon the
fact that the move was prompted by the institution's financial difficulties. Firstly,
the institution has not been able to sustain its endowment. Higgins's biggest
challenge was the lack of a deep endowment. Secondly, Robert Flynn Johnson, the
curator emeritus at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco said that the
Higgins wasn't dying, it was being killed by mismanagement and neglect. Thirdly,
the next logical step would have been for the Worcester Art Museum to assume
management of the Higgins while maintaining the collection in the armory
building. Also the Maine-based artist DeWitt Hardy backed calls for the
collection to remain in the Higgins.
Moreover, James Donnelly, the
chair of the Higgins's board of trustees, defended the integration initiative.
In addition to, the Higgins Armory was founded by the Worcester industrialist
John Woodman Higgins in 1929. The museum drew around 58,000 visitors annually.
The author reports that 1,600
objects will go on display at the Worcester Art Museum, initially in a temporary
display venue and then in a purpose built space alongside a selection of
Renaissance tapestries from 2015.
The author comes to the
conclusion that these objects are simply not important enough to justify
keeping in the collection. This deaccessioning has been peer reviewed by
colleagues from other institutions.
To my mind, this museum plays
an important part of the USA. It has a lot of historical exhibits which tell
people about their history. But I think people of any country must remember
their past.
FAIR!
ОтветитьУдалитьSLIPS:
The article reports about the decision to close THE major arms and armour museum in Massachusetts.
In addition (NO 'to'), the Higgins Armory was founded by the Worcester industrialist John Woodman Higgins in 1929.
The author comes to the conclusion that these objects are simply not important enough to justify keeping THEM in the collection.
To my mind, this museum plays an important part IN the USA.